Oct 13 close Sign in

Guide · Trend following

Does Zweig 4% Model work?

Across 375 stocks, Zweig 4% Model cut the worst fall on 82%, beat buying and holding on risk-adjusted return on 14% and on raw return on 15%. Mainly a seatbelt: it softened the big falls on most stocks, but usually gave up return to do it.

Cut the worst fall82%307 of 375 stock tests: a smaller peak-to-trough loss than holding.
Beat holding, risk-adjusted14%52 of 375: a higher Sharpe ratio than buy and hold.
Beat holding on return15%56 of 375: more money than buy and hold, after costs.
Calls right35%Of 70,731 finished calls, in before a rise or out before a fall.
Switches a year10.5Median trades per stock per year. More switching, more cost.
Time in the market59%Median share of days holding rather than in cash.

What it predicts

Buy after a 4% weekly rise off the low; sell after a 4% weekly fall from the high. Simple, and it forces you to stay with the main trend.

  • In when a weekly close is 4% above the lowest weekly close since the last sell.
  • Out when a weekly close is 4% below the highest weekly close since the last buy.

Trend following plays bet that prices that have been rising tend to keep rising for a while, and falls tend to keep falling. The family guide

How to use it

  • It trades often (about 11 switches a year per stock), so costs, spreads and taxes eat into it more than the backtest's 0.05% per switch suggests.
  • Expect to be wrong more often than right: only 35% of its calls worked. Its results come from the size of the winners, so following it means sitting through strings of small losses.
  • It worked best on Industrials & rentals (22% beat holding on risk-adjusted return) and worst on Big tech (0%).
  • Use it as one input. Your signal combines the plays you count with the other factors you weight into one call.

When it worked

Zweig 4% Model did best against holding in the COVID drop (+17% median gap) and worst in the 2020–21 rally (−27%). Median gap in return against holding the same stock (per year over stretches longer than 18 months; crypto excluded).

2008 crashRecovery 2009⁠–⁠19COVID drop2020–21 rally2022 bearSince Oct 2022
Zweig 4% Model+13%−9%+17%−27%+8%−10%

Where it worked

By kind of stock: how often it beat holding on risk-adjusted return, and the median Sharpe ratio gap.

GroupBeat holding, risk-adjustedSharpe gap
Industrials & rentals22%-0.15
Financials19%-0.13
Software & devices18%-0.24
Healthcare17%-0.20
Micro caps17%-0.26
Real estate16%-0.09
Indexes & ETFs14%-0.10
Energy & power14%-0.21
Consumer & retail12%-0.25
Industrials & materials12%-0.19
Media & telecom10%-0.12
Metals & mining10%-0.25
Semiconductors9%-0.26
Sectors8%-0.15
Big tech0%-0.11

Where it helped most

Sharpe ratio gap against holding, stocks with 3+ years of history

  1. BTDR Bitdeer Technologies+0.42
  2. EOSE Eos Energy+0.42
  3. POU Paramount Resources+0.36
  4. GPRO GoPro+0.32
  5. NFI NFI Group+0.30
  6. BTE Baytex Energy+0.28

Where it hurt most

Sharpe ratio gap against holding, stocks with 3+ years of history

  1. LEAP Quantum Critical Metals-0.90
  2. TRNS Transcat-0.74
  3. VZLA Vizsla Silver-0.67
  4. LUG Lundin Gold-0.66
  5. SKE Skeena Resources-0.65
  6. GFL GFL Environmental-0.64

Right now

Zweig 4% Model holds 150 of 377 names as of the Oct 13, 2026 close.

Changed its call in the last two weeks:

What it says on every stock

Backtest results since 2005 (or as long as each stock has traded), against holding the same stock over the same dates, after 0.05% per switch. Past results don't promise future ones. This analysis does not constitute trading advice. Please meet with an advisor or independently review sources before making any decision.

Free account

Know the moment the light flips on your stocks.

Follow your stocks and get an email with the analysis the evening a light flips. Member tools are free until January 1, 2027.