Oct 13 close Sign in

Guide · Volume & money flow

Does On-Balance Volume work?

Across 375 stocks, On-Balance Volume cut the worst fall on 73%, beat buying and holding on risk-adjusted return on 16% and on raw return on 17%. Mainly a seatbelt: it softened the big falls on most stocks, but usually gave up return to do it.

Cut the worst fall73%272 of 375 stock tests: a smaller peak-to-trough loss than holding.
Beat holding, risk-adjusted16%59 of 375: a higher Sharpe ratio than buy and hold.
Beat holding on return17%62 of 375: more money than buy and hold, after costs.
Calls right27%Of 222,392 finished calls, in before a rise or out before a fall.
Switches a year33.3Median trades per stock per year. More switching, more cost.
Time in the market55%Median share of days holding rather than in cash.

What it predicts

A running total of volume: add it on up days, subtract it on down days. Rising OBV says buyers are accumulating.

  • In when OBV is above its 20-day average.
  • Out when it is below.

Volume & money flow plays bet that volume shows conviction. The family guide

How to use it

  • It trades often (about 33 switches a year per stock), so costs, spreads and taxes eat into it more than the backtest's 0.05% per switch suggests.
  • Expect to be wrong more often than right: only 27% of its calls worked. Its results come from the size of the winners, so following it means sitting through strings of small losses.
  • It worked best on Industrials & rentals (33% beat holding on risk-adjusted return) and worst on Micro caps (0%).
  • Use it as one input. Your signal combines the plays you count with the other factors you weight into one call.

When it worked

On-Balance Volume did best against holding in the COVID drop (+21% median gap) and worst in the 2020–21 rally (−28%). Median gap in return against holding the same stock (per year over stretches longer than 18 months; crypto excluded).

2008 crashRecovery 2009⁠–⁠19COVID drop2020–21 rally2022 bearSince Oct 2022
On-Balance Volume+10%−11%+21%−28%+6%−12%

Where it worked

By kind of stock: how often it beat holding on risk-adjusted return, and the median Sharpe ratio gap.

GroupBeat holding, risk-adjustedSharpe gap
Industrials & rentals33%-0.21
Real estate26%-0.21
Financials23%-0.16
Software & devices18%-0.31
Industrials & materials18%-0.24
Healthcare17%-0.30
Energy & power15%-0.25
Indexes & ETFs14%-0.41
Consumer & retail12%-0.26
Metals & mining12%-0.22
Media & telecom10%-0.16
Semiconductors9%-0.34
Sectors0%-0.37
Big tech0%-0.32
Micro caps0%-0.56

Where it helped most

Sharpe ratio gap against holding, stocks with 3+ years of history

  1. POU Paramount Resources+0.35
  2. NPCE NeuroPace+0.34
  3. DOO BRP+0.27
  4. RKLB Rocket Lab+0.27
  5. EOSE Eos Energy+0.26
  6. AIF Altus Group+0.25

Where it hurt most

Sharpe ratio gap against holding, stocks with 3+ years of history

  1. NGEX NGEx Minerals-0.83
  2. LIN Linde-0.74
  3. CHP.UN Choice Properties REIT-0.71
  4. ROST Ross Stores-0.70
  5. AYA Aya Gold & Silver-0.70
  6. LEAP Quantum Critical Metals-0.70

Right now

On-Balance Volume holds 188 of 377 names as of the Oct 13, 2026 close.

Changed its call in the last two weeks:

What it says on every stock

Backtest results since 2005 (or as long as each stock has traded), against holding the same stock over the same dates, after 0.05% per switch. Past results don't promise future ones. This analysis does not constitute trading advice. Please meet with an advisor or independently review sources before making any decision.

Free account

Know the moment the light flips on your stocks.

Follow your stocks and get an email with the analysis the evening a light flips. Member tools are free until January 1, 2027.