Oct 13 close Sign in

Guide · Trend following

Does Williams Alligator work?

Across 375 stocks, Williams Alligator cut the worst fall on 88%, beat buying and holding on risk-adjusted return on 17% and on raw return on 18%. Mainly a seatbelt: it softened the big falls on most stocks, but usually gave up return to do it.

Cut the worst fall88%329 of 375 stock tests: a smaller peak-to-trough loss than holding.
Beat holding, risk-adjusted17%63 of 375: a higher Sharpe ratio than buy and hold.
Beat holding on return18%66 of 375: more money than buy and hold, after costs.
Calls right41%Of 97,016 finished calls, in before a rise or out before a fall.
Switches a year14.2Median trades per stock per year. More switching, more cost.
Time in the market48%Median share of days holding rather than in cash.

What it predicts

Three shifted averages called the jaw, teeth and lips. When they fan out in order, the alligator is 'eating' and the trend is up.

  • In when lips are above teeth and teeth are above jaw.
  • Out as soon as that order breaks.

Trend following plays bet that prices that have been rising tend to keep rising for a while, and falls tend to keep falling. The family guide

How to use it

  • It trades often (about 14 switches a year per stock), so costs, spreads and taxes eat into it more than the backtest's 0.05% per switch suggests.
  • Expect to be wrong more often than right: only 41% of its calls worked. Its results come from the size of the winners, so following it means sitting through strings of small losses.
  • It worked best on Big tech (33% beat holding on risk-adjusted return) and worst on Micro caps (0%).
  • Use it as one input. Your signal combines the plays you count with the other factors you weight into one call.

When it worked

Williams Alligator did best against holding in the 2008 crash (+26% median gap) and worst in the 2020–21 rally (−30%). Median gap in return against holding the same stock (per year over stretches longer than 18 months; crypto excluded).

2008 crashRecovery 2009⁠–⁠19COVID drop2020–21 rally2022 bearSince Oct 2022
Williams Alligator+26%−11%+20%−30%+8%−11%

Where it worked

By kind of stock: how often it beat holding on risk-adjusted return, and the median Sharpe ratio gap.

GroupBeat holding, risk-adjustedSharpe gap
Big tech33%-0.07
Real estate32%-0.03
Financials27%-0.09
Software & devices26%-0.22
Healthcare22%-0.21
Semiconductors22%-0.23
Industrials & materials20%-0.24
Metals & mining16%-0.24
Consumer & retail12%-0.25
Industrials & rentals11%-0.21
Energy & power7%-0.21
Sectors0%-0.25
Indexes & ETFs0%-0.19
Media & telecom0%-0.15
Micro caps0%-0.32

Where it helped most

Sharpe ratio gap against holding, stocks with 3+ years of history

  1. APP AppLovin+0.48
  2. BTC Bitcoin+0.34
  3. JWEL Jamieson Wellness+0.27
  4. BYD Boyd Group+0.26
  5. ETH Ether+0.24
  6. CAR Avis Budget+0.23

Where it hurt most

Sharpe ratio gap against holding, stocks with 3+ years of history

  1. BBUC Brookfield Business Corp-1.75
  2. TFPM Triple Flag Precious Metals-0.86
  3. GMIN G Mining Ventures-0.84
  4. DFY Definity Financial-0.83
  5. CNR Canadian National Railway-0.69
  6. CEG Constellation Energy-0.68

Right now

Williams Alligator holds 97 of 377 names as of the Oct 13, 2026 close.

Changed its call in the last two weeks:

What it says on every stock

Backtest results since 2005 (or as long as each stock has traded), against holding the same stock over the same dates, after 0.05% per switch. Past results don't promise future ones. This analysis does not constitute trading advice. Please meet with an advisor or independently review sources before making any decision.

Free account

Know the moment the light flips on your stocks.

Follow your stocks and get an email with the analysis the evening a light flips. Member tools are free until January 1, 2027.