Oct 13 close Sign in

Guide · Volume & money flow

Does Buff Averages work?

Across 375 stocks, Buff Averages cut the worst fall on 80%, beat buying and holding on risk-adjusted return on 15% and on raw return on 15%. Mainly a seatbelt: it softened the big falls on most stocks, but usually gave up return to do it.

Cut the worst fall80%299 of 375 stock tests: a smaller peak-to-trough loss than holding.
Beat holding, risk-adjusted15%56 of 375: a higher Sharpe ratio than buy and hold.
Beat holding on return15%56 of 375: more money than buy and hold, after costs.
Calls right34%Of 113,748 finished calls, in before a rise or out before a fall.
Switches a year16.7Median trades per stock per year. More switching, more cost.
Time in the market56%Median share of days holding rather than in cash.

What it predicts

Two moving averages that give heavy-volume days more weight, 5 and 20 days long. Hold while the fast one is above the slow one.

  • A volume-weighted average adds up each day's close times its volume and divides by the total volume, so busy days count more.
  • In when the 5-day volume-weighted average is above the 20-day one.
  • Out when it is below.

Volume & money flow plays bet that volume shows conviction. The family guide

How to use it

  • It trades often (about 17 switches a year per stock), so costs, spreads and taxes eat into it more than the backtest's 0.05% per switch suggests.
  • Expect to be wrong more often than right: only 34% of its calls worked. Its results come from the size of the winners, so following it means sitting through strings of small losses.
  • It worked best on Media & telecom (30% beat holding on risk-adjusted return) and worst on Sectors (0%).
  • Use it as one input. Your signal combines the plays you count with the other factors you weight into one call.

When it worked

Buff Averages did best against holding in the COVID drop (+20% median gap) and worst in the 2020–21 rally (−28%). Median gap in return against holding the same stock (per year over stretches longer than 18 months; crypto excluded).

2008 crashRecovery 2009⁠–⁠19COVID drop2020–21 rally2022 bearSince Oct 2022
Buff Averages+13%−10%+20%−28%+6%−10%

Where it worked

By kind of stock: how often it beat holding on risk-adjusted return, and the median Sharpe ratio gap.

GroupBeat holding, risk-adjustedSharpe gap
Media & telecom30%-0.21
Indexes & ETFs29%-0.12
Energy & power22%-0.18
Industrials & materials20%-0.22
Big tech17%-0.19
Micro caps17%-0.16
Real estate16%-0.11
Software & devices15%-0.31
Semiconductors13%-0.23
Financials12%-0.11
Healthcare11%-0.24
Industrials & rentals11%-0.15
Consumer & retail6%-0.23
Metals & mining6%-0.23
Sectors0%-0.22

Where it helped most

Sharpe ratio gap against holding, stocks with 3+ years of history

  1. EOSE Eos Energy+0.38
  2. POU Paramount Resources+0.31
  3. APP AppLovin+0.27
  4. CURA Curaleaf+0.25
  5. EQB EQB+0.23
  6. BTDR Bitdeer Technologies+0.23

Where it hurt most

Sharpe ratio gap against holding, stocks with 3+ years of history

  1. LEAP Quantum Critical Metals-0.85
  2. TRNS Transcat-0.81
  3. AYA Aya Gold & Silver-0.71
  4. SKE Skeena Resources-0.67
  5. GMIN G Mining Ventures-0.63
  6. ATD Alimentation Couche-Tard-0.62

Right now

Buff Averages holds 175 of 377 names as of the Oct 13, 2026 close.

Changed its call in the last two weeks:

What it says on every stock

Backtest results since 2005 (or as long as each stock has traded), against holding the same stock over the same dates, after 0.05% per switch. Past results don't promise future ones. This analysis does not constitute trading advice. Please meet with an advisor or independently review sources before making any decision.

Free account

Know the moment the light flips on your stocks.

Follow your stocks and get an email with the analysis the evening a light flips. Member tools are free until January 1, 2027.