Volume & money flow · daily rule · Crypto miners
Money Flow Index on Riot Platforms
RIOT with the play, last two years
Shading shows the play's call from the close that triggered it.
Money Flow Index (14)
Dashed lines at 20, 80.
Growth of $10,000 since 2016
Log scale. After trading costs, with T-bill interest while out.
The record
The play against buying and holding RIOT over exactly the same dates, after costs.
| Play, since 2016 | Hold, since 2016 | Play, 5 yrs | Hold, 5 yrs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return | −14.5% | +18.9% | −11.7% | −8.3% |
| Total return | −81% | +509% | −46% | −35% |
| Worst drawdown | −93.7% | −98.3% | −83.8% | −92.6% |
| Volatility | 56.6% | 111.4% | 55.5% | 94.3% |
| Sharpe ratio | −0.04 | 0.67 | −0.02 | 0.33 |
| Time invested | 39% | 100% | ||
| Switches per year | 2.3 | 0 |
Every call, graded
Right on 12 of 24 closed calls (50%). In calls averaged −8.4%; out calls saw RIOT move +170.1% on average.
| Called | Call | Price | Until | RIOT moved | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2026 | OUT | $16.57 | now | +0.6% | open |
| Nov 17, 2025 | IN | $13.88 | Jan 15, 2026 | +19.4% | ✓ right |
| Oct 8, 2024 | OUT | $8.16 | Nov 17, 2025 | +70.1% | ✕ wrong |
| Jan 22, 2024 | IN | $10.60 | Oct 8, 2024 | −23.0% | ✕ wrong |
| Dec 6, 2023 | OUT | $14.76 | Jan 22, 2024 | −28.2% | ✓ right |
| Aug 29, 2023 | IN | $12.30 | Dec 6, 2023 | +20.0% | ✓ right |
| Aug 9, 2022 | OUT | $8.14 | Aug 29, 2023 | +51.0% | ✕ wrong |
| Dec 21, 2021 | IN | $24.05 | Aug 9, 2022 | −66.1% | ✕ wrong |
| Nov 4, 2021 | OUT | $32.72 | Dec 21, 2021 | −26.5% | ✓ right |
| Jul 21, 2021 | IN | $29.16 | Nov 4, 2021 | +12.2% | ✓ right |
| Feb 18, 2020 | OUT | $1.50 | Jul 21, 2021 | +1,844.0% | ✕ wrong |
| Jul 31, 2019 | IN | $2.20 | Feb 18, 2020 | −31.8% | ✕ wrong |
An in call is right when the price rose before the next call; an out call is right when it fell. The latest 12 of 25 calls shown.
How the play works
- In when the 14-day MFI crosses up through 20.
- Out when it crosses down through 80.
The creators also stress divergences, which this rule ignores.
The case against
Valeriy Zakamulin tested moving-average timing on up to 155 years of U.S. stock data and found no statistically significant edge in the second half of that record. The rules earned their keep in a few severe bear markets and lagged buy and hold for long stretches in between.