Volume & money flow · daily rule · Consumer & retail
Money Flow Index on Monster Beverage
MNST with the play, last two years
Shading shows the play's call from the close that triggered it.
Money Flow Index (14)
Dashed lines at 20, 80.
Growth of $10,000 since 2005
Log scale. After trading costs, with T-bill interest while out.
The record
The play against buying and holding MNST over exactly the same dates, after costs.
| Play, since 2005 | Hold, since 2005 | Play, 5 yrs | Hold, 5 yrs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return | +5.9% | +28.3% | +9.0% | +15.3% |
| Total return | +249% | +22,533% | +53% | +103% |
| Worst drawdown | −47.4% | −69.2% | −26.0% | −26.0% |
| Volatility | 21.3% | 39.4% | 11.6% | 24.9% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.29 | 0.78 | 0.47 | 0.54 |
| Time invested | 27% | 100% | ||
| Switches per year | 1.3 | 0 |
Every call, graded
Right on 16 of 29 closed calls (55%). In calls averaged +9.2%; out calls saw MNST move +47.3% on average.
| Called | Call | Price | Until | MNST moved | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2025 | OUT | $28.93 | now | +49.7% | open |
| Jan 17, 2025 | IN | $24.71 | Mar 28, 2025 | +17.1% | ✓ right |
| Oct 29, 2024 | OUT | $26.24 | Jan 17, 2025 | −5.8% | ✓ right |
| Oct 16, 2023 | IN | $24.34 | Oct 29, 2024 | +7.8% | ✓ right |
| Nov 17, 2021 | OUT | $22.85 | Oct 16, 2023 | +6.5% | ✕ wrong |
| Jun 25, 2021 | IN | $23.03 | Nov 17, 2021 | −0.8% | ✕ wrong |
| Dec 30, 2019 | OUT | $15.84 | Jun 25, 2021 | +45.4% | ✕ wrong |
| Dec 26, 2018 | IN | $12.28 | Dec 30, 2019 | +29.0% | ✓ right |
| Jul 13, 2018 | OUT | $15.30 | Dec 26, 2018 | −19.8% | ✓ right |
| Apr 4, 2018 | IN | $14.19 | Jul 13, 2018 | +7.8% | ✓ right |
| Feb 24, 2017 | OUT | $10.89 | Apr 4, 2018 | +30.4% | ✕ wrong |
| Sep 15, 2016 | IN | $12.20 | Feb 24, 2017 | −10.7% | ✕ wrong |
An in call is right when the price rose before the next call; an out call is right when it fell. The latest 12 of 30 calls shown.
How the play works
- In when the 14-day MFI crosses up through 20.
- Out when it crosses down through 80.
The creators also stress divergences, which this rule ignores.
The case against
Valeriy Zakamulin tested moving-average timing on up to 155 years of U.S. stock data and found no statistically significant edge in the second half of that record. The rules earned their keep in a few severe bear markets and lagged buy and hold for long stretches in between.