Volume & money flow · daily rule · Industrials & materials
Money Flow Index on Linamar
LNR with the play, last two years
Shading shows the play's call from the close that triggered it.
Money Flow Index (14)
Dashed lines at 20, 80.
Growth of C$10,000 since 2005
Log scale. After trading costs, with T-bill interest while out.
The record
The play against buying and holding LNR over exactly the same dates, after costs.
| Play, since 2005 | Hold, since 2005 | Play, 5 yrs | Hold, 5 yrs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return | +2.2% | +10.1% | +1.8% | +8.4% |
| Total return | +60% | +710% | +9% | +49% |
| Worst drawdown | −85.4% | −91.7% | −42.3% | −42.9% |
| Volatility | 30.2% | 40.3% | 21.0% | 31.8% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.16 | 0.39 | 0.01 | 0.29 |
| Time invested | 46% | 100% | ||
| Switches per year | 2.7 | 0 |
Every call, graded
Right on 33 of 59 closed calls (56%). In calls averaged +8.7%; out calls saw LNR move +8.8% on average.
| Called | Call | Price | Until | LNR moved | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2025 | OUT | C$74.61 | now | +25.3% | open |
| Oct 2, 2025 | IN | C$75.31 | Nov 20, 2025 | −0.9% | ✕ wrong |
| Nov 26, 2024 | OUT | C$58.27 | Oct 2, 2025 | +29.2% | ✕ wrong |
| Aug 18, 2023 | IN | C$65.87 | Nov 26, 2024 | −11.5% | ✕ wrong |
| Jul 20, 2023 | OUT | C$70.46 | Aug 18, 2023 | −6.5% | ✓ right |
| Mar 27, 2023 | IN | C$58.47 | Jul 20, 2023 | +20.5% | ✓ right |
| Aug 5, 2022 | OUT | C$55.07 | Mar 27, 2023 | +6.2% | ✕ wrong |
| Dec 21, 2021 | IN | C$67.55 | Aug 5, 2022 | −18.5% | ✕ wrong |
| Nov 24, 2021 | OUT | C$72.47 | Dec 21, 2021 | −6.8% | ✓ right |
| Sep 22, 2021 | IN | C$60.68 | Nov 24, 2021 | +19.4% | ✓ right |
| Oct 15, 2020 | OUT | C$40.99 | Sep 22, 2021 | +48.0% | ✕ wrong |
| Sep 24, 2020 | IN | C$35.09 | Oct 15, 2020 | +16.8% | ✓ right |
An in call is right when the price rose before the next call; an out call is right when it fell. The latest 12 of 60 calls shown.
How the play works
- In when the 14-day MFI crosses up through 20.
- Out when it crosses down through 80.
The creators also stress divergences, which this rule ignores.
The case against
Valeriy Zakamulin tested moving-average timing on up to 155 years of U.S. stock data and found no statistically significant edge in the second half of that record. The rules earned their keep in a few severe bear markets and lagged buy and hold for long stretches in between.