Volume & money flow · daily rule · Metals & mining
Money Flow Index on Hudbay Minerals
HBM with the play, last two years
Shading shows the play's call from the close that triggered it.
Money Flow Index (14)
Dashed lines at 20, 80.
Growth of C$10,000 since 2005
Log scale. After trading costs, with T-bill interest while out.
The record
The play against buying and holding HBM over exactly the same dates, after costs.
| Play, since 2005 | Hold, since 2005 | Play, 5 yrs | Hold, 5 yrs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return | +3.1% | +11.9% | +18.6% | +33.7% |
| Total return | +92% | +1,021% | +134% | +325% |
| Worst drawdown | −85.9% | −92.6% | −35.1% | −62.2% |
| Volatility | 35.4% | 55.9% | 26.7% | 52.6% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.22 | 0.45 | 0.63 | 0.74 |
| Time invested | 38% | 100% | ||
| Switches per year | 1.9 | 0 |
Every call, graded
Right on 25 of 40 closed calls (62%). In calls averaged +8.0%; out calls saw HBM move +34.4% on average.
| Called | Call | Price | Until | HBM moved | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2026 | OUT | C$37.79 | now | −3.3% | open |
| Mar 23, 2026 | IN | C$25.82 | Sep 23, 2026 | +46.4% | ✓ right |
| Mar 14, 2024 | OUT | C$9.06 | Mar 23, 2026 | +185.0% | ✕ wrong |
| Aug 22, 2023 | IN | C$6.42 | Mar 14, 2024 | +41.1% | ✓ right |
| Apr 10, 2023 | OUT | C$6.69 | Aug 22, 2023 | −4.0% | ✓ right |
| Feb 8, 2023 | IN | C$7.11 | Apr 10, 2023 | −5.9% | ✕ wrong |
| Oct 18, 2021 | OUT | C$9.09 | Feb 8, 2023 | −21.8% | ✓ right |
| Jun 1, 2021 | IN | C$9.30 | Oct 18, 2021 | −2.3% | ✕ wrong |
| Dec 13, 2019 | OUT | C$5.09 | Jun 1, 2021 | +82.8% | ✕ wrong |
| Aug 15, 2019 | IN | C$4.30 | Dec 13, 2019 | +18.3% | ✓ right |
| Jun 14, 2019 | OUT | C$6.80 | Aug 15, 2019 | −36.7% | ✓ right |
| May 28, 2019 | IN | C$6.40 | Jun 14, 2019 | +6.3% | ✓ right |
An in call is right when the price rose before the next call; an out call is right when it fell. The latest 12 of 41 calls shown.
How the play works
- In when the 14-day MFI crosses up through 20.
- Out when it crosses down through 80.
The creators also stress divergences, which this rule ignores.
The case against
Valeriy Zakamulin tested moving-average timing on up to 155 years of U.S. stock data and found no statistically significant edge in the second half of that record. The rules earned their keep in a few severe bear markets and lagged buy and hold for long stretches in between.