Candles & chart patterns · daily rule · Indexes & ETFs
Engulfing Switch on Gold ETF
What the play says
Latest reading: Pattern 0.00
GLD with the play, last two years
Shading shows the play's call from the close that triggered it.
Engulfing patterns (+1 bullish, −1 bearish)
Dashed line at 0.
Growth of $10,000 since 2005
Log scale. After trading costs, with T-bill interest while out.
The record
The play against buying and holding GLD over exactly the same dates, after costs.
| Play, since 2005 | Hold, since 2005 | Play, 5 yrs | Hold, 5 yrs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return | +4.3% | +10.6% | +13.5% | +18.0% |
| Total return | +150% | +787% | +88% | +128% |
| Worst drawdown | −36.0% | −45.6% | −13.1% | −26.4% |
| Volatility | 12.2% | 18.3% | 11.9% | 18.9% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.26 | 0.54 | 0.80 | 0.77 |
| Time invested | 44% | 100% | ||
| Switches per year | 3.2 | 0 |
Every call, graded
Right on 33 of 69 closed calls (48%). In calls averaged +2.6%; out calls saw GLD move +4.5% on average.
| Called | Call | Price | Until | GLD moved | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2026 | IN | $368.41 | now | +3.6% | open |
| Jul 7, 2026 | OUT | $377.49 | Jul 17, 2026 | −2.4% | ✓ right |
| Jun 11, 2026 | IN | $386.32 | Jul 7, 2026 | −2.3% | ✕ wrong |
| Apr 22, 2025 | OUT | $311.11 | Jun 11, 2026 | +24.2% | ✕ wrong |
| Mar 18, 2024 | IN | $200.03 | Apr 22, 2025 | +55.5% | ✓ right |
| Jan 2, 2024 | OUT | $190.72 | Mar 18, 2024 | +4.9% | ✕ wrong |
| Nov 13, 2023 | IN | $180.51 | Jan 2, 2024 | +5.7% | ✓ right |
| Jul 20, 2023 | OUT | $182.74 | Nov 13, 2023 | −1.2% | ✓ right |
| May 23, 2023 | IN | $183.43 | Jul 20, 2023 | −0.4% | ✕ wrong |
| May 1, 2023 | OUT | $183.97 | May 23, 2023 | −0.3% | ✓ right |
| Nov 23, 2022 | IN | $163.08 | May 1, 2023 | +12.8% | ✓ right |
| Sep 14, 2022 | OUT | $157.93 | Nov 23, 2022 | +3.3% | ✕ wrong |
An in call is right when the price rose before the next call; an out call is right when it fell. The latest 12 of 70 calls shown.
How the play works
- Bullish engulfing: after a decline, a down day (close below open) is followed by an up day that opens at or below the prior close and closes at or above the prior open.
- Bearish engulfing: after a rise, an up day is followed by a down day that opens at or above the prior close and closes at or below the prior open.
- In at the close of a bullish engulfing day. Out at the close of a bearish engulfing day. Otherwise the rule keeps its last call.
A decline (or rise) means the prior close is below (or above) the close 5 sessions before it. Nison and Bulkowski require a prior trend but give no number.
Nison weighs support, resistance and confirmation, which a mechanical rule cannot judge. No confirmation day is required here.
Shadows are ignored, as both Nison and Bulkowski allow. One edge of the new body may equal the old body's edge, as in the TA-Lib pattern library, but not both.
Crypto trades around the clock, so a coin's daily open is just the prior close. For coins the open is taken as the prior close, and the pattern becomes a close beyond the prior day's open.
Where the rules come from
The case against
Valeriy Zakamulin tested moving-average timing on up to 155 years of U.S. stock data and found no statistically significant edge in the second half of that record. The rules earned their keep in a few severe bear markets and lagged buy and hold for long stretches in between.