Volume & money flow · daily rule · Financials
Money Flow Index on EQB
EQB with the play, last two years
Shading shows the play's call from the close that triggered it.
Money Flow Index (14)
Dashed lines at 20, 80.
Growth of C$10,000 since 2005
Log scale. After trading costs, with T-bill interest while out.
The record
The play against buying and holding EQB over exactly the same dates, after costs.
| Play, since 2005 | Hold, since 2005 | Play, 5 yrs | Hold, 5 yrs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return | +4.8% | +13.7% | +12.6% | +12.0% |
| Total return | +177% | +1,513% | +80% | +76% |
| Worst drawdown | −69.9% | −72.6% | −31.9% | −44.8% |
| Volatility | 22.4% | 32.6% | 18.8% | 29.6% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.24 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.40 |
| Time invested | 41% | 100% | ||
| Switches per year | 3.8 | 0 |
Every call, graded
Right on 48 of 83 closed calls (58%). In calls averaged +3.5%; out calls saw EQB move +6.6% on average.
| Called | Call | Price | Until | EQB moved | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2026 | IN | C$133.94 | now | −9.1% | open |
| Jul 15, 2024 | OUT | C$91.72 | Aug 25, 2026 | +46.0% | ✕ wrong |
| May 30, 2024 | IN | C$84.84 | Jul 15, 2024 | +8.1% | ✓ right |
| Apr 8, 2024 | OUT | C$84.29 | May 30, 2024 | +0.7% | ✕ wrong |
| Mar 20, 2024 | IN | C$78.83 | Apr 8, 2024 | +6.9% | ✓ right |
| Jul 24, 2023 | OUT | C$69.48 | Mar 20, 2024 | +13.5% | ✕ wrong |
| Mar 14, 2023 | IN | C$53.41 | Jul 24, 2023 | +30.1% | ✓ right |
| Feb 3, 2023 | OUT | C$61.82 | Mar 14, 2023 | −13.6% | ✓ right |
| Jun 28, 2022 | IN | C$49.58 | Feb 3, 2023 | +24.7% | ✓ right |
| May 31, 2022 | OUT | C$57.88 | Jun 28, 2022 | −14.3% | ✓ right |
| Dec 16, 2021 | IN | C$62.22 | May 31, 2022 | −7.0% | ✕ wrong |
| Aug 16, 2021 | OUT | C$70.17 | Dec 16, 2021 | −11.3% | ✓ right |
An in call is right when the price rose before the next call; an out call is right when it fell. The latest 12 of 84 calls shown.
How the play works
- In when the 14-day MFI crosses up through 20.
- Out when it crosses down through 80.
The creators also stress divergences, which this rule ignores.
The case against
Valeriy Zakamulin tested moving-average timing on up to 155 years of U.S. stock data and found no statistically significant edge in the second half of that record. The rules earned their keep in a few severe bear markets and lagged buy and hold for long stretches in between.