Volume & money flow · daily rule · Energy & power
Money Flow Index on Energy Fuels
EFR with the play, last two years
Shading shows the play's call from the close that triggered it.
Money Flow Index (14)
Dashed lines at 20, 80.
Growth of C$10,000 since 2005
Log scale. After trading costs, with T-bill interest while out.
The record
The play against buying and holding EFR over exactly the same dates, after costs.
| Play, since 2005 | Hold, since 2005 | Play, 5 yrs | Hold, 5 yrs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return | +0.4% | +0.6% | +1.7% | +6.3% |
| Total return | +9% | +15% | +9% | +35% |
| Worst drawdown | −88.1% | −99.6% | −58.8% | −64.8% |
| Volatility | 63.9% | 89.7% | 48.4% | 70.9% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.28 | 0.42 | 0.20 | 0.38 |
| Time invested | 44% | 100% | ||
| Switches per year | 3.0 | 0 |
Every call, graded
Right on 35 of 67 closed calls (52%). In calls averaged +7.2%; out calls saw EFR move +35.6% on average.
| Called | Call | Price | Until | EFR moved | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2026 | IN | C$24.48 | now | −46.1% | open |
| Jan 9, 2026 | OUT | C$25.25 | Mar 23, 2026 | −3.0% | ✓ right |
| Nov 20, 2025 | IN | C$18.59 | Jan 9, 2026 | +35.8% | ✓ right |
| Jul 22, 2025 | OUT | C$12.50 | Nov 20, 2025 | +48.7% | ✕ wrong |
| Jan 3, 2025 | IN | C$8.28 | Jul 22, 2025 | +51.0% | ✓ right |
| May 24, 2024 | OUT | C$8.97 | Jan 3, 2025 | −7.7% | ✓ right |
| Feb 27, 2024 | IN | C$8.98 | May 24, 2024 | −0.1% | ✕ wrong |
| Aug 9, 2022 | OUT | C$8.84 | Feb 27, 2024 | +1.6% | ✕ wrong |
| Dec 15, 2021 | IN | C$10.07 | Aug 9, 2022 | −12.2% | ✕ wrong |
| Sep 8, 2021 | OUT | C$8.08 | Dec 15, 2021 | +24.6% | ✕ wrong |
| Apr 29, 2021 | IN | C$6.85 | Sep 8, 2021 | +18.0% | ✓ right |
| Jun 5, 2020 | OUT | C$2.22 | Apr 29, 2021 | +208.6% | ✕ wrong |
An in call is right when the price rose before the next call; an out call is right when it fell. The latest 12 of 68 calls shown.
How the play works
- In when the 14-day MFI crosses up through 20.
- Out when it crosses down through 80.
The creators also stress divergences, which this rule ignores.
The case against
Valeriy Zakamulin tested moving-average timing on up to 155 years of U.S. stock data and found no statistically significant edge in the second half of that record. The rules earned their keep in a few severe bear markets and lagged buy and hold for long stretches in between.