Volume & money flow · daily rule · Energy & power
Money Flow Index on CES Energy Solutions
CEU with the play, last two years
Shading shows the play's call from the close that triggered it.
Money Flow Index (14)
Dashed lines at 20, 80.
Growth of C$10,000 since 2006
Log scale. After trading costs, with T-bill interest while out.
The record
The play against buying and holding CEU over exactly the same dates, after costs.
| Play, since 2006 | Hold, since 2006 | Play, 5 yrs | Hold, 5 yrs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return | +1.1% | +19.6% | +8.1% | +60.7% |
| Total return | +24% | +3,780% | +47% | +961% |
| Worst drawdown | −85.7% | −94.3% | −18.5% | −41.8% |
| Volatility | 37.8% | 49.8% | 8.4% | 41.4% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.17 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 1.26 |
| Time invested | 39% | 100% | ||
| Switches per year | 2.8 | 0 |
Every call, graded
Right on 38 of 58 closed calls (66%). In calls averaged +2.6%; out calls saw CEU move +11.1% on average.
| Called | Call | Price | Until | CEU moved | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2022 | OUT | C$2.80 | now | +616.6% | open |
| Sep 9, 2022 | IN | C$2.28 | Nov 8, 2022 | +22.9% | ✓ right |
| Nov 30, 2020 | OUT | C$0.999 | Sep 9, 2022 | +128.0% | ✕ wrong |
| Jan 16, 2020 | IN | C$1.80 | Nov 30, 2020 | −44.5% | ✕ wrong |
| Jan 3, 2020 | OUT | C$1.97 | Jan 16, 2020 | −8.5% | ✓ right |
| Oct 8, 2019 | IN | C$1.77 | Jan 3, 2020 | +11.2% | ✓ right |
| Sep 18, 2019 | OUT | C$1.79 | Oct 8, 2019 | −1.2% | ✓ right |
| Aug 12, 2019 | IN | C$1.77 | Sep 18, 2019 | +1.3% | ✓ right |
| Jun 25, 2019 | OUT | C$1.95 | Aug 12, 2019 | −9.3% | ✓ right |
| Jun 14, 2018 | IN | C$4.22 | Jun 25, 2019 | −53.8% | ✕ wrong |
| May 1, 2018 | OUT | C$5.23 | Jun 14, 2018 | −19.2% | ✓ right |
| Feb 22, 2018 | IN | C$4.64 | May 1, 2018 | +12.6% | ✓ right |
An in call is right when the price rose before the next call; an out call is right when it fell. The latest 12 of 59 calls shown.
How the play works
- In when the 14-day MFI crosses up through 20.
- Out when it crosses down through 80.
The creators also stress divergences, which this rule ignores.
The case against
Valeriy Zakamulin tested moving-average timing on up to 155 years of U.S. stock data and found no statistically significant edge in the second half of that record. The rules earned their keep in a few severe bear markets and lagged buy and hold for long stretches in between.