Mean reversion · daily rule · Market indexes
Bollinger Reversion on S&P 500 index
What the play says
S&P 500 with the play, last two years
Shading shows the play's call from the close that triggered it.
Growth of 10,000 since 2005
Log scale. After trading costs, with T-bill interest while out.
The record
The play against buying and holding S&P 500 over exactly the same dates, after costs.
| Play, since 2005 | Hold, since 2005 | Play, 5 yrs | Hold, 5 yrs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return | +5.7% | +9.0% | +12.0% | +12.4% |
| Total return | +234% | +549% | +76% | +79% |
| Worst drawdown | −28.8% | −56.8% | −10.6% | −25.4% |
| Volatility | 13.2% | 19.0% | 11.2% | 17.0% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.35 | 0.46 | 0.73 | 0.55 |
| Time invested | 19% | 100% | ||
| Switches per year | 9.0 | 0 |
Every call, graded
Right on 128 of 196 closed calls (65%). In calls averaged +1.1%; out calls saw S&P 500 move +1.2% on average.
| Called | Call | Price | Until | S&P 500 moved | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2026 | OUT | 7,764.70 | now | +0.5% | open |
| Sep 16, 2026 | IN | 7,551.81 | Sep 21, 2026 | +2.8% | ✓ right |
| Jul 31, 2026 | OUT | 7,489.72 | Sep 16, 2026 | +0.8% | ✕ wrong |
| Jul 29, 2026 | IN | 7,316.15 | Jul 31, 2026 | +2.4% | ✓ right |
| Jun 15, 2026 | OUT | 7,554.29 | Jul 29, 2026 | −3.2% | ✓ right |
| Jun 10, 2026 | IN | 7,266.99 | Jun 15, 2026 | +4.0% | ✓ right |
| Apr 6, 2026 | OUT | 6,611.83 | Jun 10, 2026 | +9.9% | ✕ wrong |
| Mar 6, 2026 | IN | 6,740.02 | Apr 6, 2026 | −1.9% | ✕ wrong |
| Feb 6, 2026 | OUT | 6,932.30 | Mar 6, 2026 | −2.8% | ✓ right |
| Feb 5, 2026 | IN | 6,798.40 | Feb 6, 2026 | +2.0% | ✓ right |
| Jan 23, 2026 | OUT | 6,915.61 | Feb 5, 2026 | −1.7% | ✓ right |
| Jan 20, 2026 | IN | 6,796.86 | Jan 23, 2026 | +1.7% | ✓ right |
An in call is right when the price rose before the next call; an out call is right when it fell. The latest 12 of 197 calls shown.
How the play works
- In on a close below the lower band (20-day average − 2 standard deviations).
- Out on a close above the 20-day average.
This runs against Bollinger's advice that tags of the bands are not signals. It is shown because so many traders use it.
The case against
Valeriy Zakamulin tested moving-average timing on up to 155 years of U.S. stock data and found no statistically significant edge in the second half of that record. The rules earned their keep in a few severe bear markets and lagged buy and hold for long stretches in between.