Mean reversion · daily rule · Real estate
Bollinger Reversion on Boardwalk REIT
What the play says
BEI.UN with the play, last two years
Shading shows the play's call from the close that triggered it.
Growth of C$10,000 since 2005
Log scale. After trading costs, with T-bill interest while out.
The record
The play against buying and holding BEI.UN over exactly the same dates, after costs.
| Play, since 2005 | Hold, since 2005 | Play, 5 yrs | Hold, 5 yrs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return | +1.3% | +10.9% | +0.2% | +6.5% |
| Total return | +33% | +848% | +1% | +37% |
| Worst drawdown | −58.0% | −71.3% | −17.0% | −33.4% |
| Volatility | 16.9% | 26.8% | 10.8% | 20.7% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.06 | 0.46 | −0.28 | 0.22 |
| Time invested | 19% | 100% | ||
| Switches per year | 7.0 | 0 |
Every call, graded
Right on 90 of 151 closed calls (60%). In calls averaged +0.4%; out calls saw BEI.UN move +3.8% on average.
| Called | Call | Price | Until | BEI.UN moved | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2026 | IN | C$62.42 | now | −3.5% | open |
| Jun 5, 2026 | OUT | C$63.54 | Aug 31, 2026 | −1.8% | ✓ right |
| May 8, 2026 | IN | C$64.16 | Jun 5, 2026 | −1.0% | ✕ wrong |
| Apr 1, 2026 | OUT | C$63.12 | May 8, 2026 | +1.6% | ✕ wrong |
| Feb 23, 2026 | IN | C$64.36 | Apr 1, 2026 | −1.9% | ✕ wrong |
| Dec 17, 2025 | OUT | C$61.51 | Feb 23, 2026 | +4.6% | ✕ wrong |
| Dec 3, 2025 | IN | C$59.62 | Dec 17, 2025 | +3.2% | ✓ right |
| Nov 12, 2025 | OUT | C$61.96 | Dec 3, 2025 | −3.8% | ✓ right |
| Sep 25, 2025 | IN | C$64.97 | Nov 12, 2025 | −4.6% | ✕ wrong |
| Aug 29, 2025 | OUT | C$66.92 | Sep 25, 2025 | −2.9% | ✓ right |
| Aug 11, 2025 | IN | C$66.74 | Aug 29, 2025 | +0.3% | ✓ right |
| Apr 24, 2025 | OUT | C$60.60 | Aug 11, 2025 | +10.1% | ✕ wrong |
An in call is right when the price rose before the next call; an out call is right when it fell. The latest 12 of 152 calls shown.
How the play works
- In on a close below the lower band (20-day average − 2 standard deviations).
- Out on a close above the 20-day average.
This runs against Bollinger's advice that tags of the bands are not signals. It is shown because so many traders use it.
The case against
Valeriy Zakamulin tested moving-average timing on up to 155 years of U.S. stock data and found no statistically significant edge in the second half of that record. The rules earned their keep in a few severe bear markets and lagged buy and hold for long stretches in between.